Daniel C. Pevear

62 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Daniel C. Pevear
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.6k
  • Molecular Medicine 316
  • Infectious Diseases 977
  • Epidemiology 1.3k
  • Virology 172
Replace Lawrence B. Blyn with:
Lawrence B. Blyn United States
Sylvie Alonso Singapore
Rob Lambkin‐Williams United Kingdom
Clyde S. Crumpacker United States
Laurence Tiley United Kingdom
Jan Paeshuyse Belgium
Martin Friede Switzerland
Arianna Loregian Italy
Stephan Pleschka Germany
A. Hajime Koyama Japan
Daniel C. Pevear relative to Lawrence B. Blyn United States Lawrence B. Blyn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lawrence B. Blyn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Pevear

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Pevear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Pevear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Pevear more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Pevear

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Pevear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Pevear. The network helps show where Daniel C. Pevear may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel C. Pevear, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel C. Pevear Line = papers co-authored together Daniel C. Pevear links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999283
2 2019229
3 1995222
4 2003216
5 2004185
6 2004171
7 1994169
8 1987164
9 1989160
10 1993130
11 1995112
12 200089
13 199583
14 199282
15 200679
16 200577
17 198876
18 199675
19 198268
20 199366

About Daniel C. Pevear

Daniel C. Pevear is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Molecular Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 63 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Viral Infections and Immunology Research (27 papers), Respiratory viral infections research (18 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (13 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (7 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (7 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (6 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (6 papers) and Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.6k citations), Molecular Medicine (316 citations), Infectious Diseases (977 citations), Epidemiology (1.3k citations) and Virology (172 citations). Daniel C. Pevear has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include James M. Groarke, Michael G. Rossmann, Frank J. Dutko, Marc S. Collett, Guy D. Diana, Howard L. Lipton, Martin E. Seipel, Mark A. McKinlay, Marcia J. Kremer and M A Calenoff. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Journal of Virology, Open Forum Infectious Diseases and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact