Mark Potters

516 citations
10 papers · 389 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • Hepatology top 5%
    • Hepatitis Viruses Studies and Epidemiology
    • Liver Disease and Transplantation
    • Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases

Papers in

Mark Potters

10 papers receiving 375 citations

Peers

Mark Potters
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Hepatology 260
  • Small Animals 105
  • Infectious Diseases 225
  • Insect Science 21
  • Molecular Biology 83
Replace Geke Hägele with:
Geke Hägele Netherlands
Gregory Raczniak United States
Peter Müller Canada
Luke Moertel Australia
Bárbara C. Figueiredo Brazil
N. A. Moloney United Kingdom
Xu-Ren Yin China
Wenming Huang China
Tegan A. Don Australia
Mark Potters relative to Geke Hägele Netherlands Geke Hägele's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
Geke Hägele · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Potters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Potters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Potters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Potters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Potters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Potters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Potters. The network helps show where Mark Potters may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Potters, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Potters Line = papers co-authored together Mark Potters links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2001283
2 200322
3 200322
4 202019
5 202213
6 20059
7 20157
8 20236
9 20086
10 20252

About Mark Potters

Mark Potters is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Insect Science, Materials Chemistry, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Genetics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 389 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enzyme Structure and Function (3 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (3 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (2 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (2 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (2 papers), Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (1 paper), Hepatitis Viruses Studies and Epidemiology (1 paper) and Liver Disease and Transplantation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (260 citations), Small Animals (105 citations), Infectious Diseases (225 citations), Insect Science (21 citations) and Molecular Biology (83 citations). Mark Potters has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Xiang‐Jin Meng, Camille Gilbert, Patrick G. Halbur, D. K. Guenette, T. E. Toth, Suzanne U. Emerson, Chaiyan Kasorndorkbua, Robert H. Purcell, Peter J. Kennelly and Brian H. Lower. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bacteriology, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Extremophiles, G3 Genes Genomes Genetics and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact