Thomas E. Toth

30 papers receiving 582 citations

Peers

Thomas E. Toth
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Animal Science and Zoology 375
  • Infectious Diseases 320
  • Small Animals 112
  • Genetics 245
  • Endocrinology 37
Replace Zhibiao Yang with:
Zhibiao Yang China
Junsuke Shirai Japan
L. Valíček Czechia
Cheville Nf United States
G. Abraham Australia
V. v. Bülow Germany
P. Vannier France
C. S. Eidson United States
L. Rodák Czechia
L. van der Heide United States
Thomas E. Toth relative to Zhibiao Yang China Zhibiao Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Zhibiao Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Toth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Toth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Toth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Toth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Toth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Toth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Toth. The network helps show where Thomas E. Toth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Toth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. Toth Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. Toth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000203
2 200179
3 200049
4 196947
5 199842
6 199925
7 199220
8 200520
9 199615
10 197013
11 199513
12 200112
13
Reaction of the avian respiratory system to intratracheally administered avirulent Salmonella typhimurium.
199212
14 198210
15 20009
16 19929
17 19956
18 19706
19 19885
20 19834

About Thomas E. Toth

Thomas E. Toth is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Genetics and Microbiology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 623 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Virus Infections Studies (11 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (7 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (5 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (5 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (5 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (4 papers), Viral Infections and Immunology Research (4 papers) and Virology and Viral Diseases (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (375 citations), Infectious Diseases (320 citations), Small Animals (112 citations), Genetics (245 citations) and Endocrinology (37 citations). Thomas E. Toth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Xiang‐Jin Meng, Patrick G. Halbur, Michael Gill, Martijn Fenaux, Stephen M. Boyle, Gerhardt G. Schurig, Ramesh Vemulapalli, Nammalwar Sriranganathan, D. K. Guenette and Sabrina L. Swenson. Their work appears in journals such as Avian Diseases, Veterinary Microbiology, American Journal of Veterinary Research, Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Aquaculture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact