Mark Parker
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 1%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Developmental Neuroscience top 5%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Papers in
-
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics 13
- Co-authors
- Douglas A. Cotanche (4 shared papers)Phil Green (4 shared papers)Mark Hawley (3 shared papers)Pam Enderby (3 shared papers)Evan Y. Snyder (2 shared papers)Albert S.B. Edge (4 shared papers)Aurore Brugeaud (2 shared papers)Stuart Cunningham (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Hearing Research (2 papers)Journal of Visualized Experiments (2 papers)Studies in Romanticism (1 paper)Human Gene Therapy Methods (1 paper)Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomJapan
In The Last Decade
Mark Parker
37 papers receiving 816 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Sensory Systems 294
- Developmental Neuroscience 81
- Occupational Therapy 36
- Cognitive Neuroscience 176
- Speech and Hearing 56
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Parker
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Parker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Parker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Parker. The network helps show where Mark Parker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Parker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 98 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 87 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 72 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 68 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 62 | |
| 6 | 1986 | 52 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 44 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 42 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 38 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 37 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 36 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 35 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 32 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 25 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 12 | |
| 19 | 2003 | 12 | |
| 20 | 1990 | 11 |
About Mark Parker
Mark Parker is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Health Professions and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 40 papers that have together received 864 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (13 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (7 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (4 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (3 papers), Marine animal studies overview (2 papers), Noise Effects and Management (2 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (2 papers) and Drilling and Well Engineering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (294 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (81 citations), Occupational Therapy (36 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (176 citations) and Speech and Hearing (56 citations). Mark Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Douglas A. Cotanche, Phil Green, Mark Hawley, Pam Enderby, Evan Y. Snyder, Albert S.B. Edge, Aurore Brugeaud, Stuart Cunningham, Naomi F. Bramhall and Kook In Park. Their work appears in journals such as Hearing Research, Journal of Visualized Experiments, Studies in Romanticism, Human Gene Therapy Methods and Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.