Mark O’Neil-Johnson

1.4k citations
45 papers · 1.2k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

    • Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 19
    • Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis 10
    • Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 8

Mark O’Neil-Johnson

45 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Mark O’Neil-Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Pharmacology 267
  • Biotechnology 100
  • Pharmacology 95
  • Molecular Biology 727
  • Biochemistry 76
Replace Matt G. Goering with:
Matt G. Goering United States
Sunil K. Chattopadhyay India
Ionara I. Dalcol Brazil
Jin‐Rui Dai United States
Wen‐Xuan Wang China
Eliane Garo Switzerland
Rex T. Weavers New Zealand
Gil Valdo José da Silva Brazil
Jonathan M. Schmidt Canada
Hongwen Tao China
Mark O’Neil-Johnson relative to Matt G. Goering United States Matt G. Goering's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Matt G. Goering · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark O’Neil-Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark O’Neil-Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark O’Neil-Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark O’Neil-Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark O’Neil-Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark O’Neil-Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark O’Neil-Johnson. The network helps show where Mark O’Neil-Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark O’Neil-Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark O’Neil-Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Mark O’Neil-Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004114
2 201479
3 200664
4 201463
5 201563
6 200554
7 200952
8 201846
9 200541
10 200440
11 201535
12 201634
13 201034
14 198831
15 201330
16 200529
17 200729
18 201526
19 199126
20 201524

About Mark O’Neil-Johnson

Mark O’Neil-Johnson is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Organic Chemistry, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (19 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (10 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (8 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (8 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (8 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (4 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (4 papers) and Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (267 citations), Biotechnology (100 citations), Pharmacology (95 citations), Molecular Biology (727 citations) and Biochemistry (76 citations). Mark O’Neil-Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Courtney M. Starks, Gary R. Eldridge, Matt G. Goering, Russell B. Williams, Jin‐Feng Hu, Eliane Garo, Hye‐Dong Yoo, Peadar Cremin, Grayson Hough and Toni M. Kutchan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Natural Products, Phytochemistry, Planta Medica, The Plant Journal and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact