Mark Moses
Impact in
-
- Healthcare Systems and Reforms
-
- HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
- Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Papers in
-
- HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses 1
-
- Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology 1
- Co-authors
- Christopher J L Murray (3 shared papers)Nancy Fullman (2 shared papers)Abraham D. Flaxman (2 shared papers)Joseph L. Dieleman (3 shared papers)Laura Di Giorgio (2 shared papers)Jennifer Kates (2 shared papers)Jonathan C. Brown (1 shared paper)John Everett Mumford (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Lancet Public Health (1 paper)BMJ Global Health (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS (1 paper)The Lancet HIV (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandChina
In The Last Decade
Mark Moses
9 papers receiving 185 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Finance 27
- Infectious Diseases 43
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2
- General Health Professions 25
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 15
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Moses
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Moses's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Moses with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Moses more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Moses
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Moses. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Moses. The network helps show where Mark Moses may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Moses, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 70 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 40 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 0 |
About Mark Moses
Mark Moses is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Infectious Diseases, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 10 papers that have together received 191 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment (1 paper), Global Health Care Issues (1 paper), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (1 paper), Enzyme Structure and Function (1 paper), HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses (1 paper), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (1 paper), Employment and Welfare Studies (1 paper) and Protein Structure and Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (27 citations), Infectious Diseases (43 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (2 citations), General Health Professions (25 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (15 citations). Mark Moses has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and China. Frequent co-authors include Christopher J L Murray, Nancy Fullman, Abraham D. Flaxman, Joseph L. Dieleman, Laura Di Giorgio, Jennifer Kates, Jonathan C. Brown, John Everett Mumford, Marcia R. Weaver and Annie Haakenstad. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet Public Health, BMJ Global Health, Scientific Reports, Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS and The Lancet HIV.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.