Mark M. Emerson

1.4k citations
25 papers · 947 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Mark M. Emerson

25 papers receiving 942 citations

Peers

Mark M. Emerson
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 218
  • Aging 42
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 353
  • Cell Biology 213
  • Molecular Biology 614
Replace Kenichiro D. Uno with:
Kenichiro D. Uno Japan
Jens Looser Canada
Matthieu Cavey France
Chan-Yen Ou United States
Jay P. Uhler Sweden
Maureen A. Peters United States
Donald J. van Meyel Canada
Nele A Haelterman United States
Andrew C. Zelhof United States
Carol L. Freund United States
Mark M. Emerson relative to Kenichiro D. Uno Japan Kenichiro D. Uno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kenichiro D. Uno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark M. Emerson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark M. Emerson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark M. Emerson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark M. Emerson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark M. Emerson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark M. Emerson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark M. Emerson. The network helps show where Mark M. Emerson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark M. Emerson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark M. Emerson Line = papers co-authored together Mark M. Emerson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014141
2 1998107
3 2007106
4 2013104
5 200275
6 199867
7 200356
8 201147
9 201842
10 202029
11 201028
12 199921
13 200918
14 201818
15 201918
16 201816
17 201914
18 202011
19 20028
20 20217

About Mark M. Emerson

Mark M. Emerson is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cell Biology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Plant Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 947 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (14 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (5 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (5 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (4 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (3 papers), Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ (3 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers) and Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (218 citations), Aging (42 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (353 citations), Cell Biology (213 citations) and Molecular Biology (614 citations). Mark M. Emerson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Constance L. Cepko, Amita Sehgal, Sui Wang, Zhaohai Yang, Henry S. Su, David Van Vactor, Natalia Surzenko, Jillian J. Goetz, Jeffrey M. Trimarchi and James P. Mahaffey. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Biology, Scientific Reports, Developmental Cell, Developmental Dynamics and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact