Mark Llewellyn
Impact in
-
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism
- Crime and Detective Fiction Studies
- Narrative Theory and Analysis
- Urban Studies top 5%
- Urban Planning and Governance
Papers in
-
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism 6
- Crime and Detective Fiction Studies 3
-
- Advanced Database Systems and Queries 5
- Co-authors
- Ann Heilmann (9 shared papers)M.A. Bassiouni (5 shared papers)Mohiuddin Ahmed (1 shared paper)Amar Mukherjee (1 shared paper)Robert L. Cook (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Nineteenth-Century Literature (1 paper)Information and Software Technology (1 paper)Feminist Review (1 paper)Critical Survey (1 paper)Victorian poetry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Mark Llewellyn
19 papers receiving 227 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Literature and Literary Theory 105
- Urban Studies 53
- Geography, Planning and Development 42
- Cultural Studies 30
- History 32
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Llewellyn
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Llewellyn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Llewellyn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Llewellyn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Llewellyn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Llewellyn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Llewellyn. The network helps show where Mark Llewellyn may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Mark Llewellyn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 43 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 42 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 24 | |
| 6 | What is neo-victorian studies? | 2008 | 22 |
| 7 | 2010 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1991 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 1 |
About Mark Llewellyn
Mark Llewellyn is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Computer Networks and Communications, Signal Processing, History and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 27 papers that have together received 288 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contemporary Literature and Criticism (6 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (5 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (5 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (3 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (3 papers), Architecture, Design, and Social History (3 papers) and Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (105 citations), Urban Studies (53 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (42 citations), Cultural Studies (30 citations) and History (32 citations). Mark Llewellyn has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ann Heilmann, M.A. Bassiouni, Mohiuddin Ahmed, Amar Mukherjee and Robert L. Cook. Their work appears in journals such as Nineteenth-Century Literature, Information and Software Technology, Feminist Review, Critical Survey and Victorian poetry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.