Mark Ledbetter

16 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers

Mark Ledbetter
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Health 125
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 72
  • Applied Psychology 25
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 52
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 60
Replace John W. Lace with:
John W. Lace United States
Concepción López Soler Spain
Wai‐Cheong Carl Tam Taiwan
Elizabeth C. Long United States
Emily Bennett United Kingdom
Leslie D. Rosenstein United States
Weixi Kang United Kingdom
Brina Caplan United States
Jean Gagnon Canada
J. M. Otero Spain
Mark Ledbetter relative to John W. Lace United States John W. Lace's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
John W. Lace · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Ledbetter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Ledbetter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Ledbetter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Ledbetter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Ledbetter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Ledbetter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Ledbetter. The network helps show where Mark Ledbetter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Mark Ledbetter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Ledbetter Line = papers co-authored together Mark Ledbetter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 199172
2 200058
3 200051
4 199151
5 199138
6 198837
7 201619
8 199610
9 19967
10 19877
11 19893
12 20222
13 19972
14 19872
15 20001
16 19991

About Mark Ledbetter

Mark Ledbetter is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Epidemiology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 361 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (3 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (2 papers) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (125 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (72 citations), Applied Psychology (25 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (52 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (60 citations). Mark Ledbetter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David S. Tulsky, Leslie Smith, Aurelio Prifitera, Gale H. Roid, David C. Fisher, J. P. Das, Joseph J. Stevens, Jack A. Naglieri, Paul Maertens and James D. Foster. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychology and Theology, Psychological Assessment, Journal of Child Neurology, Journal of School Psychology and Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact