Mark Ledbetter
Impact in
- Health top 5%
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
-
- Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Papers in
-
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction 2
- Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs 1
-
- Cognitive Abilities and Testing 4
- Co-authors
- David S. Tulsky (3 shared papers)Leslie Smith (2 shared papers)Aurelio Prifitera (1 shared paper)Gale H. Roid (1 shared paper)David C. Fisher (1 shared paper)J. P. Das (1 shared paper)Jack A. Naglieri (1 shared paper)Joseph J. Stevens (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Psychology and Theology (5 papers)Psychological Assessment (2 papers)Journal of School Psychology (1 paper)Journal of Child Neurology (1 paper)Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark Ledbetter
19 papers receiving 360 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Health 137
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 78
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 64
- Applied Psychology 23
- Psychiatry and Mental health 65
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Ledbetter
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Ledbetter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Ledbetter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Ledbetter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Ledbetter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Ledbetter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Ledbetter. The network helps show where Mark Ledbetter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Mark Ledbetter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1991 | 79 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 62 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 54 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 43 | |
| 6 | 1988 | 40 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 11 | |
| 10 | 1987 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1989 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1987 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 1 |
About Mark Ledbetter
Mark Ledbetter is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Health and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (3 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (3 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (2 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers) and Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (137 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (78 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (64 citations), Applied Psychology (23 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (65 citations). Mark Ledbetter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David S. Tulsky, Leslie Smith, Aurelio Prifitera, Gale H. Roid, David C. Fisher, J. P. Das, Jack A. Naglieri, Joseph J. Stevens, Paul Maertens and James D. Foster. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychology and Theology, Psychological Assessment, Journal of School Psychology, Journal of Child Neurology and Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.