Mark Latham
Impact in
- Public Administration top 10%
- Labor Movements and Unions
- Finance top 10%
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
- Community Development and Social Impact
Papers in
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 3
- Economic theories and models 2
- Co-authors
- Jane Barber (1 shared paper)Bjørn Lomborg (1 shared paper)Rajarathinam Parthasarathy (2 shared papers)Margaret Jollands (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Finance (4 papers)Corporate Governance An International Review (2 papers)Business History (1 paper)Labour History (1 paper)Financial Analysts Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandUnited StatesAustria
In The Last Decade
Mark Latham
39 papers receiving 225 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Public Administration 33
- Finance 74
- Accounting 41
- Strategy and Management 41
- Economics and Econometrics 62
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Latham
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Latham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Latham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Latham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Latham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Latham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Latham. The network helps show where Mark Latham may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Mark Latham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Civilising Global Capital: New Thinking for Australian Labor | 1998 | 63 |
| 2 | The enabling state : people before bureaucracy | 2001 | 50 |
| 3 | 1986 | 21 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 14 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1989 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1986 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 7 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 6 | |
| 14 | PROXY VOTING BRAND COMPETITION | 2007 | 5 |
| 15 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 18 | What did you learn today | 2001 | 4 |
| 19 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2003 | 4 |
About Mark Latham
Mark Latham is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Marketing, Accounting and Law, having authored 47 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (5 papers), Copyright and Intellectual Property (4 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (3 papers), Intellectual Property Law (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers), Stochastic processes and financial applications (2 papers), Economic theories and models (2 papers) and Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (33 citations), Finance (74 citations), Accounting (41 citations), Strategy and Management (41 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (62 citations). Mark Latham has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Jane Barber, Bjørn Lomborg, Rajarathinam Parthasarathy and Margaret Jollands. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Finance, Corporate Governance An International Review, Business History, Labour History and Financial Analysts Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.