Mark Sidel

780 citations
56 papers · 350 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Sidel

43 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers

Mark Sidel
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Public Administration 55
  • Development 26
  • Sociology and Political Science 265
  • Strategy and Management 60
  • Finance 36
Replace Jamie Levine Daniel with:
Jamie Levine Daniel United States
Otto Holman Netherlands
Vincent A. Mahler United States
Jelmer Schalk Netherlands
Lilian Miles United Kingdom
Arne Heise Germany
Virginia Oliveros United States
Gregory M. Luebbert United States
Barbara Nunberg United States
Verónica Montecinos United States
Mark Sidel relative to Jamie Levine Daniel United States Jamie Levine Daniel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21×
Jamie Levine Daniel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Sidel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Sidel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Sidel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Sidel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Sidel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Sidel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Sidel. The network helps show where Mark Sidel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Mark Sidel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Sidel Line = papers co-authored together Mark Sidel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200835
2 201034
3
The Guardians Guarding Themselves: A Comparative Perspective on Nonprofit Self-Regulation
200525
4 201025
5 202022
6 201717
7 201816
8 200816
9 201915
10 200613
11 200110
12 20208
13 19938
14 20107
15 20097
16
Recent Research on Philanthropy and the Nonprofit Sector in India and South Asia
20017
17
Regulation of the Voluntary Sector: Freedom and Security in an Era of Uncertainty
20077
18 19976
19 20236
20 20076

About Mark Sidel

Mark Sidel is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Law, Demography and Strategy and Management, having authored 56 papers that have together received 350 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (12 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (12 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (9 papers), Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development (4 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (3 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (3 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (3 papers) and Community Development and Social Impact (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (55 citations), Development (26 citations), Sociology and Political Science (265 citations), Strategy and Management (60 citations) and Finance (36 citations). Mark Sidel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Mary Kay Gugerty, Angela Bies, Vincent Mosco and David Moore. Their work appears in journals such as VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, Asian Survey, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Nonprofit Policy Forum and The China Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact