Mark Kuil

1.8k citations
29 papers · 1.3k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Kuil

29 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Mark Kuil
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Inorganic Chemistry 733
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 144
  • Organic Chemistry 907
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 70
  • Spectroscopy 100
Replace Nathan D. Jones with:
Nathan D. Jones Canada
Pierre‐Alain R. Breuil France
S. Lipstman Israel
Mathivanan Packiarajan United States
Barbara J. Burger United States
Hervé des Abbayes France
Benjamin J. Frogley Australia
Toby J. Woods United States
Chiaki Yoshina‐Ishii Canada
Eugene Khaskin Japan
Mark Kuil relative to Nathan D. Jones Canada Nathan D. Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Nathan D. Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Kuil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Kuil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Kuil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Kuil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Kuil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Kuil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Kuil. The network helps show where Mark Kuil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Kuil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Kuil Line = papers co-authored together Mark Kuil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006193
2 2006112
3 200697
4 200990
5 200781
6 200872
7 200770
8 200565
9 200964
10 200854
11 200549
12 200248
13 200846
14 200838
15 200934
16 200831
17 201031
18 198926
19 200720
20 201317

About Mark Kuil

Mark Kuil is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Process Chemistry and Technology and Ecology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (11 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (9 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (7 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (5 papers), Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (5 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (4 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (4 papers) and Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (733 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (144 citations), Organic Chemistry (907 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (70 citations) and Spectroscopy (100 citations). Mark Kuil has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Joost N. H. Reek, Piet W. N. M. van Leeuwen, Anthony L. Spek, Arjan W. Kleij, Duncan M. Tooke, P. Elsbeth Goudriaan, Albertus J. Sandee, Theresa Soltner, Frédéric W. Patureau and Rienk van Grondelle. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemistry, Chemical Communications, Dalton Transactions, Chemistry - A European Journal and Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact