Mark Kitchen
Impact in
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Pharmacy top 10%
- Obesity and Health Practices
Papers in
- Surgery 12
- Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes 6
- Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments 6
- Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies 2
-
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 5
- Co-authors
- Paul Super (6 shared papers)Rishi Singhal (6 shared papers)Richard D. Emes (5 shared papers)William E. Farrell (4 shared papers)Anthony A. Fryer (4 shared papers)Richard T. Bryan (5 shared papers)John R. Glossop (2 shared papers)Kim E. Haworth (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Obesity Surgery (3 papers)Surgical Endoscopy (2 papers)The Clinical Teacher (2 papers)International Journal of Surgery (2 papers)Epigenetics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsIraq
In The Last Decade
Mark Kitchen
23 papers receiving 351 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 40
- Pharmacy 25
- Surgery 155
- Cancer Research 31
- Family Practice 3
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Kitchen
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Kitchen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Kitchen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Kitchen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Kitchen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Kitchen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Kitchen. The network helps show where Mark Kitchen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Kitchen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 54 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 47 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 36 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 1 |
About Mark Kitchen
Mark Kitchen is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Radiation, having authored 26 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (6 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (6 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (5 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (2 papers), Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies (2 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (2 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (1 paper) and Urologic and reproductive health conditions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (40 citations), Pharmacy (25 citations), Surgery (155 citations), Cancer Research (31 citations) and Family Practice (3 citations). Mark Kitchen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Iraq. Frequent co-authors include Paul Super, Rishi Singhal, Richard D. Emes, William E. Farrell, Anthony A. Fryer, Richard T. Bryan, John R. Glossop, Kim E. Haworth, Nicholas D. James and Kar Keung Cheng. Their work appears in journals such as Obesity Surgery, Surgical Endoscopy, The Clinical Teacher, International Journal of Surgery and Epigenetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.