Daniel C. Turner

22 papers receiving 493 citations

Peers

Daniel C. Turner
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Ophthalmology 140
  • Cell Biology 101
  • Physiology 154
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 46
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 112
Replace Sofia Fili with:
Sofia Fili Germany
Luis F. Torres United States
Donghoon Lee South Korea
Mona Lindström Sweden
Michael D. Flood United States
Ronald D. Macdonald Canada
Nidhi Garg Australia
Luísa Villa Italy
Tali Yaakobi Israel
Felix Riano United States
Daniel C. Turner relative to Sofia Fili Germany Sofia Fili's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Sofia Fili · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Turner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Turner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Turner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Turner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Turner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Turner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Turner. The network helps show where Daniel C. Turner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel C. Turner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel C. Turner Line = papers co-authored together Daniel C. Turner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201980
2 201957
3 201953
4 202033
5 202129
6 201728
7 201827
8 202026
9 201726
10 202323
11 201919
12 201919
13 201818
14 202212
15 202111
16 202310
17 20188
18 20248
19 20237
20
The Magnitude of IOP Spikes Associated with Blink and Saccade
20141

About Daniel C. Turner

Daniel C. Turner is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, Physiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Cell Biology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 498 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (7 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (7 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (6 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (5 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (3 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers) and Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (140 citations), Cell Biology (101 citations), Physiology (154 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (46 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (112 citations). Daniel C. Turner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Adam P. Sharples, Robert A. Seaborne, J. Crawford Downs, Christopher A. Girkin, Neil R. W. Martin, Andreas Kasper, Jessica V. Jasien, Carrie Huisingh, Jonathan C. Jarvis and Jeffrey S. Morris. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, Journal of Cellular Physiology, Translational Vision Science & Technology and American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact