Mark J. Jones

757 citations
7 papers · 618 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Mark J. Jones

6 papers receiving 586 citations

Peers

Mark J. Jones
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Aerospace Engineering 332
  • Mechanical Engineering 363
  • Inorganic Chemistry 133
  • Materials Chemistry 344
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 42
Replace C.J. Tweed with:
C.J. Tweed United Kingdom
Xiaoqing Shang China
Emmanuelle Brackx France
Carlos F. Jové-Colón United States
Bing Sun China
W.C. Butterman United States
Sujin Hong South Korea
Xiaodong Yuan China
Karel Lemmens Belgium
Mireia Molera Spain
Mark J. Jones relative to C.J. Tweed United Kingdom C.J. Tweed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.2×
C.J. Tweed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark J. Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark J. Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark J. Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark J. Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark J. Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark J. Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark J. Jones. The network helps show where Mark J. Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Mark J. Jones, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark J. Jones Line = papers co-authored together Mark J. Jones links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2003291
2 2003133
3 2004102
4 200156
5 201135
6
EXAFS studies of co-precipitation and adsorption reactions of Tc
20021
7 20250

About Mark J. Jones

Mark J. Jones is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Global and Planetary Change, Aerospace Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 7 papers that have together received 618 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radioactive element chemistry and processing (4 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (3 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (2 papers), Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties (2 papers), Microstructure and mechanical properties (2 papers), Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (1 paper), Radioactivity and Radon Measurements (1 paper) and Metallurgy and Material Forming (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aerospace Engineering (332 citations), Mechanical Engineering (363 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (133 citations), Materials Chemistry (344 citations) and Geochemistry and Petrology (42 citations). Mark J. Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include F.J. Humphreys, J.D. Robson, P.B. Prangnell, David J. Vaughan, John Charnock, R. A. D. Pattrick, Francis R. Livens, Lesley N. Moyes, Christoph Hennig and J. Frederick W. Mosselmans. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Materialia, Journal of Applied Physics, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, Applied Geochemistry and Environmental Science & Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact