William Gibson

60 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

William Gibson
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 226
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 341
  • Pharmacology 265
  • Human-Computer Interaction 92
  • Physiology 311
Replace Laura Frey‐Law with:
Laura Frey‐Law United States
Maxime Billot France
Marco Barbero Switzerland
James S. Thomas United States
Morten Kristoffersen Norway
Paul H. Strutton United Kingdom
Mats Djupsjöbacka Sweden
Yocheved Laufer Israel
Julia Treleaven Australia
Silvestro Roatta Italy
William Gibson relative to Laura Frey‐Law United States Laura Frey‐Law's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Laura Frey‐Law · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Gibson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Gibson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Gibson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Gibson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Gibson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Gibson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Gibson. The network helps show where William Gibson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Gibson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Gibson Line = papers co-authored together William Gibson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017149
2 2019144
3 1995135
4 200991
5 201688
6 201881
7 201976
8 201468
9 200567
10 198566
11 202158
12 201958
13 200656
14 201844
15 201630
16 201826
17 201625
18 201524
19 201422
20 200921

About William Gibson

William Gibson is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Pharmacology, Physiology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tendon Structure and Treatment (15 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (10 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (8 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (7 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (5 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (5 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (4 papers) and Shoulder Injury and Treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (226 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (341 citations), Pharmacology (265 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (92 citations) and Physiology (311 citations). William Gibson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Denmark and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Neil E O’Connell, Benedict M. Wand, Thomas Graven‐Nielsen, Lars Arendt‐Nielsen, Mervyn Travers, James Debenham, Myles Murphy, Dan Ariely, Jannick P. Rolland and Catherine Meads. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, British Journal of Sports Medicine, Journal of science and medicine in sport, Journal of Pain and Experimental Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact