Mark J. Berry

661 citations
17 papers · 455 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Mark J. Berry

17 papers receiving 445 citations

Peers

Mark J. Berry
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Biochemistry 70
  • Food Science 95
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 92
  • Horticulture 4
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 84
Replace Renee C. Strauch with:
Renee C. Strauch United States
Milka Mileva Bulgaria
Wai‐Jane Ho Taiwan
Stéphane Etheve Switzerland
Lijuan Wei China
Chongwei Zhang China
Xiaojuan Chen China
Yazhong Ge China
Shin‐Yu Chen Taiwan
Ahood Khalid Pakistan
Mark J. Berry relative to Renee C. Strauch United States Renee C. Strauch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Renee C. Strauch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark J. Berry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark J. Berry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark J. Berry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark J. Berry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark J. Berry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark J. Berry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark J. Berry. The network helps show where Mark J. Berry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark J. Berry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark J. Berry Line = papers co-authored together Mark J. Berry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201186
2 201666
3 199136
4 201834
5 201533
6 201728
7 200927
8 199724
9 199321
10 199221
11 201020
12 202118
13 197514
14 200211
15 20167
16 19946
17 19913

About Mark J. Berry

Mark J. Berry is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biochemistry, Food Science and Plant Science, having authored 17 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein purification and stability (7 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (6 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (3 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (2 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (2 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers) and Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (70 citations), Food Science (95 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (92 citations), Horticulture (4 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (84 citations). Mark J. Berry has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Julian Davies, Leon A. Terry, Sally Redfern, Monique S. J. Simmonds, Frits Quadt, Ellen Siobhan Mitchell, Catherine Transler, L.A.W. Jans, Ina Smith and Don Kirkup. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chromatography A, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, British Journal Of Nutrition and Planta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact