Mark H. Lang

21.0k citations
80 papers · 15.2k · 11 hit papers · h-index 37

Impact in

  • Accounting top 0.02%
    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
    • Corporate Finance and Governance
    • Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
    • Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting
  • Finance top 0.05%
    • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies

Papers in

    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 61
    • Corporate Finance and Governance 53
    • Corporate Taxation and Avoidance 10
    • Accounting Education and Careers 5
    • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 35

Mark H. Lang

78 papers receiving 13.9k citations

Mark H. Lang's Hit Papers

The evolution of 10-K textual disclosure: Evidence from Latent Dirichlet Allocation 2017 · 520 citations
5200+11+22Years since publication50010001.5k2.0k

Peers

Mark H. Lang
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Accounting 13.9k
  • Finance 5.4k
  • Strategy and Management 7.1k
  • Management Information Systems 1.1k
  • Economics and Econometrics 1.6k
Replace Mary E. Barth with:
Mary E. Barth United States
Katherine Schipper United States
Douglas J. Skinner United States
Thomas Z. Lys United States
Mark L. DeFond United States
Robert M. Bushman United States
Jennifer Francis United States
Jere R. Francis United States
Wayne R. Landsman United States
Shivaram Rajgopal United States
Mark H. Lang relative to Mary E. Barth United States Mary E. Barth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mary E. Barth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark H. Lang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark H. Lang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark H. Lang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark H. Lang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark H. Lang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark H. Lang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark H. Lang. The network helps show where Mark H. Lang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark H. Lang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark H. Lang Line = papers co-authored together Mark H. Lang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Cross-Sectional Determinants of Analyst Ratings of Corporate Disclosures
Hit paper breakdown →
19932231
2
Corporate Disclosure Policy and Analyst Behavior.
Hit paper breakdown →
19962128
3
International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality
Hit paper breakdown →
20082075
4
ADRs, Analysts, and Accuracy: Does Cross Listing in the United States Improve a Firm's Information Environment and Increase Market Value?
Hit paper breakdown →
2003889
5
Voluntary Disclosure and Equity Offerings: Reducing Information Asymmetry or Hyping the Stock?*
Hit paper breakdown →
2000739
6
Earnings management and cross listing: Are reconciled earnings comparable to US earnings?Π
Hit paper breakdown →
2005613
7
Are IFRS-based and US GAAP-based accounting amounts comparable?
Hit paper breakdown →
2012556
8
International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality
Hit paper breakdown →
2005535
9
The evolution of 10-K textual disclosure: Evidence from Latent Dirichlet Allocation
Hit paper breakdown →
2017520
10 2003478
11 1996365
12 1994363
13
Textual analysis and international financial reporting: Large sample evidence
Hit paper breakdown →
2015330
14 1994312
15
CFO Narcissism and Financial Reporting Quality
Hit paper breakdown →
2017279
16 2002271
17 1993232
18 1998224
19 2002140
20 2004136

About Mark H. Lang

Mark H. Lang is a scholar working on Accounting, Finance, Strategy and Management, Economics and Econometrics and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 80 papers that have together received 15.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (61 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (53 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (35 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (19 papers), Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (10 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (5 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (4 papers) and Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (13.9k citations), Finance (5.4k citations), Strategy and Management (7.1k citations), Management Information Systems (1.1k citations) and Economics and Econometrics (1.6k citations). Mark H. Lang has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Russell J. Lundholm, Wayne R. Landsman, Mary E. Barth, Karl V. Lins, Darius P. Miller, Jana Smith Raedy, Lorien Stice‐Lawrence, Wendy M. Wilson, Steven J. Huddart and Travis Dyer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Accounting Research, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Contemporary Accounting Research, The Accounting Review and Journal of Financial Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact