Charles Ham
Impact in
- Accounting top 2%
- Corporate Finance and Governance
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
- Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
- Finance top 5%
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Papers in
-
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 9
- Corporate Finance and Governance 8
- Finance 7
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 6
- Co-authors
- Sean Wang (3 shared papers)Nicholas Seybert (2 shared papers)Mark H. Lang (1 shared paper)Mark T. Leary (1 shared paper)Kevin Koharki (1 shared paper)Irving W. Wainer (1 shared paper)Jeffrey W. Jacobs (1 shared paper)James T. McFarland (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Review of Accounting Studies (4 papers)The Accounting Review (2 papers)Biochemistry (1 paper)Management Science (1 paper)Journal of Accounting Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndonesiaHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Charles Ham
11 papers receiving 648 citations
Charles Ham's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Accounting 495
- Finance 182
- Strategy and Management 175
- Clinical Psychology 128
- Management of Technology and Innovation 33
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Ham
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Ham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Ham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Ham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Ham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Ham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Ham. The network helps show where Charles Ham may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Charles Ham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CFO Narcissism and Financial Reporting Quality Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 265 |
| 2 | 2017 | 201 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 79 | |
| 4 | 1974 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 42 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2025 | 0 |
About Charles Ham
Charles Ham is a scholar working on Accounting, Finance, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, General Decision Sciences and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 12 papers that have together received 686 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (9 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (8 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (6 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (2 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (1 paper), Pancreatic function and diabetes (1 paper), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Disaster Response and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (495 citations), Finance (182 citations), Strategy and Management (175 citations), Clinical Psychology (128 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (33 citations). Charles Ham has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Indonesia and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Sean Wang, Nicholas Seybert, Mark H. Lang, Mark T. Leary, Kevin Koharki, Irving W. Wainer, Jeffrey W. Jacobs, James T. McFarland, Philip G. Berger and Michael D. Kimbrough. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Accounting Studies, The Accounting Review, Biochemistry, Management Science and Journal of Accounting Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.