Mark Gush

55 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Mark Gush
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Global and Planetary Change 627
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 269
  • Soil Science 187
  • Water Science and Technology 236
  • Forestry 61
Replace Ricardo Mata‐González with:
Ricardo Mata‐González United States
Rafael Coll Delgado Brazil
João de Athaydes Silva junior Brazil
G. C. S. Negi India
Oliver van Straaten Germany
Pedram Attarod Iran
Dennis Ochuodho Otieno Germany
Rodolfo Marcondes Silva Souza Brazil
Caroline Vincke Belgium
Lucian Constantin DINCĂ Romania
Mark Gush relative to Ricardo Mata‐González United States Ricardo Mata‐González's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Ricardo Mata‐González · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Gush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Gush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Gush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Gush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Gush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Gush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Gush. The network helps show where Mark Gush may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Gush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Gush Line = papers co-authored together Mark Gush links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021135
2 2012104
3 201682
4 201576
5 201254
6 201851
7 201946
8 200246
9 201544
10 202040
11 201435
12 201430
13 202028
14 201326
15 201124
16 201924
17 202018
18 201117
19 202214
20 201814

About Mark Gush

Mark Gush is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology, Soil Science, Ecology and Atmospheric Science, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (27 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (15 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (11 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (8 papers), Irrigation Practices and Water Management (7 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (7 papers), Forest ecology and management (6 papers) and Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (627 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (269 citations), Soil Science (187 citations), Water Science and Technology (236 citations) and Forestry (61 citations). Mark Gush has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sebinasi Dzikiti, David C. Le Maître, Colin S. Everson, Vivek Naiken, Klaudia Schachtschneider, Greg G. Forsyth, Michael G. Mengistu, André Görgens, Abel Ramoelo and Moses Azong Cho. Their work appears in journals such as Water SA, Forest Ecology and Management, Agricultural Water Management, Journal of Arid Environments and Earth system science data.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact