Mark E. Thomas

684 citations
21 papers · 525 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Mark E. Thomas

20 papers receiving 511 citations

Peers

Mark E. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Nephrology 235
  • Clinical Biochemistry 29
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 68
  • Hematology 38
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 42
Replace Montserrat M. Díaz Encarnación with:
Montserrat M. Díaz Encarnación Spain
C. Orphanides United Kingdom
Nadya Mothu France
Insa E. Emrich Germany
Liangxiang Xiao China
Paola Cirina Italy
Yuki Takazawa Japan
Jessica L. Friedrich United States
Gopala K. Rangan Australia
Mark E. Thomas relative to Montserrat M. Díaz Encarnación Spain Montserrat M. Díaz Encarnación's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Montserrat M. Díaz Encarnación · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Thomas. The network helps show where Mark E. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark E. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Mark E. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002119
2 1999108
3 1993106
4 199375
5 201550
6 199546
7 20206
8 20022
9 20102
10 20241
11 20201
12 20201
13 20201
14 20201
15 20201
16 20201
17 20201
18 20201
19 20201
20 20201

About Mark E. Thomas

Mark E. Thomas is a scholar working on Nephrology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Surgery, having authored 21 papers that have together received 525 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (6 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (5 papers), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (4 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (2 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (2 papers) and Biomedical Research and Pathophysiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (235 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (29 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (68 citations), Hematology (38 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (42 citations). Mark E. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include George F. Schreiner, Kevin P.G. Harris, John Walls, Peter Furness, Nigel J. Brunskill, Elaine M. Bailey, J. H. Pringle, Aubrey R. Morrison, Somanath Padhi and J. B. Glen. Their work appears in journals such as Kidney International, American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, BMJ, American Journal of Nephrology and Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact