Mark E. Limes

532 citations
19 papers · 417 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Mark E. Limes

19 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers

Mark E. Limes
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 323
  • Biophysics 38
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 86
  • Polymers and Plastics 18
  • Physiology 20
Replace Phillip Dluhy with:
Phillip Dluhy Canada
P.Y. Bourgeois France
Iouri V. Solomatine United States
Christopher M. Phenicie United States
Venkata Ramaiah Badarla Japan
Stefan M. Weber Germany
Joon-Sung Chang South Korea
Laure Lavoute France
Simon J. Herr Germany
I. I. Ryzhov Russia
Mark E. Limes relative to Phillip Dluhy Canada Phillip Dluhy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9×
Phillip Dluhy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Limes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Limes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Limes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Limes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Limes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Limes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Limes. The network helps show where Mark E. Limes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Limes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark E. Limes Line = papers co-authored together Mark E. Limes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2018123
2 201543
3 201540
4 202238
5 202134
6 200625
7 202123
8 201922
9 201316
10 201316
11 201311
12 20257
13 20165
14 20195
15 20253
16
Numerical study of spin-dependent transition rates within pairs of dipolar and exchange coupled spins with (s=1/2) during magnetic resonant excitation
20132
17 20152
18 20151
19
A 3 He- 129 Xe co-magnetometer with 87 Rb magnetometry
20161

About Mark E. Limes

Mark E. Limes is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy, Biophysics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 417 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (11 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (5 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (3 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (2 papers), Strong Light-Matter Interactions (1 paper), Vibration and Dynamic Analysis (1 paper) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (323 citations), Biophysics (38 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (86 citations), Polymers and Plastics (18 citations) and Physiology (20 citations). Mark E. Limes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include M. V. Romalis, Thomas W. Kornack, Christoph Boehme, Michael V. Romalis, Elizabeth L. Foley, John M. Lupton, Vito Giovanni Lucivero, Brian T. Saam, Kipp J. van Schooten and H. Malissa. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review B, Nature Communications, Physical Review A, Physical review. B. and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact