Mark E. Ireland

779 citations
29 papers · 600 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Mark E. Ireland

28 papers receiving 578 citations

Peers

Mark E. Ireland
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Reproductive Medicine 79
  • Cell Biology 122
  • Molecular Biology 430
  • Ophthalmology 44
  • Urology 23
Replace Jacques Tréton with:
Jacques Tréton France
Karen E. Roth United States
C. Jaworski United States
Liping Yang China
D Evain France
J Kreysing Germany
Lisa Brennan United States
B I Weinstein United States
James R. Mertz United States
David Wan‐Cheng Li China
Mark E. Ireland relative to Jacques Tréton France Jacques Tréton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.3×
Jacques Tréton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Ireland

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Ireland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Ireland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Ireland more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Ireland

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Ireland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Ireland. The network helps show where Mark E. Ireland may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Ireland, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark E. Ireland Line = papers co-authored together Mark E. Ireland links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198497
2 198278
3 198751
4 199637
5 198431
6 198331
7 199928
8 200026
9 197920
10 199320
11
Differentiation of chick lens epithelial cells: involvement of the epidermal growth factor receptor and endogenous ligand.
200020
12 198520
13 199219
14 199216
15 199316
16 198614
17 198713
18 200712
19 199312
20
Initial characterization of lens beta-adrenergic receptors.
198910

About Mark E. Ireland

Mark E. Ireland is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Reproductive Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Physiology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 600 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Connexins and lens biology (15 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (5 papers), Heat shock proteins research (3 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (3 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (2 papers), Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (2 papers) and Connective tissue disorders research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (79 citations), Cell Biology (122 citations), Molecular Biology (430 citations), Ophthalmology (44 citations) and Urology (23 citations). Mark E. Ireland has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include H. Maisel, Michael J. Welsh, Jon C. Aster, N. Lieska, Ronald H. Bradley, Glenn J. Treisman, Khiem Tran, Barnett B. Rosenblum, Christine M. Berns and Sandra Galoforo. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Eye Research, Current Eye Research, Endocrinology, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and The Anatomical Record.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact