Mark E. Fraser

704 citations
32 papers · 595 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Mark E. Fraser

30 papers receiving 515 citations

Peers

Mark E. Fraser
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Atmospheric Science 157
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 120
  • Analytical Chemistry 70
  • Spectroscopy 105
  • Electrochemistry 31
Replace J. Jarosz with:
J. Jarosz France
Byron A. Palmer United States
R. D. Reid United States
R. C. Miller United States
H. Bergmann South Africa
P. J. Padley United Kingdom
J. A. Irvin Australia
W. Felder United States
Pamela M. Chu United States
Harry D. Downing United States
Mark E. Fraser relative to J. Jarosz France J. Jarosz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
J. Jarosz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Fraser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Fraser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Fraser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Fraser. The network helps show where Mark E. Fraser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Fraser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark E. Fraser Line = papers co-authored together Mark E. Fraser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197174
2 198957
3 199657
4 198941
5 200040
6 198338
7 198831
8 198531
9 199829
10 198228
11 200025
12
Proc. Blizzard Challenge Workshop 2006
200622
13 199217
14 198413
15 199013
16
The Cerevoice Blizzard Entry 2006: A Prototype Small Database Unit Selection Engine
200611
17 199010
18 198510
19 19839
20 19868

About Mark E. Fraser

Mark E. Fraser is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Spectroscopy, Mechanics of Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Applied Mathematics, having authored 32 papers that have together received 595 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (6 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (6 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (5 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (5 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (5 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (3 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (3 papers) and Analytical chemistry methods development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (157 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (120 citations), Analytical Chemistry (70 citations), Spectroscopy (105 citations) and Electrochemistry (31 citations). Mark E. Fraser has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Malaysia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include W. T. Rawlins, Steven M. Miller, Donald H. Stedman, Lawrence G. Piper, A. E. Hamielec, Wei‐Kao Lu, Ronald S. Sheinson, W. A. M. Blumberg, Steven J. Davis and Matthew P. Aylett. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry and Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact