Mark DeWolfe Howe

663 citations
33 papers · 196 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Mark DeWolfe Howe

27 papers receiving 116 citations

Peers

Mark DeWolfe Howe
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Law 45
  • Political Science and International Relations 80
  • History 24
  • Archeology 2
  • Sociology and Political Science 61
Replace Julian P. Boyd with:
Julian P. Boyd United States
J. R. Dinwiddy United Kingdom
George Athan Billias United States
Willi Paul Adams Germany
Fred L. Israel United States
Michael McGiffert United States
William O. Douglas United States
Wesley Frank Craven United States
Colin Rhys Lovell United States
Charles Donahue United States
Mark DeWolfe Howe relative to Julian P. Boyd United States Julian P. Boyd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Julian P. Boyd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark DeWolfe Howe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark DeWolfe Howe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark DeWolfe Howe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark DeWolfe Howe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark DeWolfe Howe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark DeWolfe Howe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark DeWolfe Howe. The network helps show where Mark DeWolfe Howe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Mark DeWolfe Howe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark DeWolfe Howe Line = papers co-authored together Mark DeWolfe Howe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195125
2 196124
3 195419
4 195518
5 195311
6 195310
7 19539
8 19577
9 19687
10 19597
11 19567
12 19516
13 19515
14 19515
15 19535
16 19535
17 19635
18 19584
19 19533
20 19553

About Mark DeWolfe Howe

Mark DeWolfe Howe is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Law, History, Sociology and Political Science and Marketing, having authored 33 papers that have together received 196 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (10 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (4 papers), American Sports and Literature (3 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (2 papers), American History and Culture (2 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (1 paper), Land Rights and Reforms (1 paper) and European and International Law Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (45 citations), Political Science and International Relations (80 citations), History (24 citations), Archeology (2 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (61 citations). Mark DeWolfe Howe has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Julian P. Boyd, Thomas Jefferson, George L. Haskins, Sidney Hook, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Harold J. Laski, Edward Dumbauld, Thomas I. Cook, Joseph H. Smith and Allan Nevins. Their work appears in journals such as Harvard Law Review, The New England Quarterly, The William and Mary Quarterly, The American Historical Review and The Yale Law Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact