Mark Delderfield

467 citations
6 papers · 286 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Delderfield

4 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

Mark Delderfield
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Information Systems and Management 174
  • Information Systems 168
  • Management Science and Operations Research 50
  • Health Information Management 14
  • Artificial Intelligence 90
Replace Vaibhav Khadilkar with:
Vaibhav Khadilkar United States
Claudiu Farcas United States
Johannes Kirschnick Germany
Canh Ngo Netherlands
IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg Netherlands
Markus Lorch United States
James Magowan United Kingdom
Qun Ni United States
Kathrin Dentler Netherlands
Richard Vdovjak Netherlands
Mark Delderfield relative to Vaibhav Khadilkar United States Vaibhav Khadilkar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Vaibhav Khadilkar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Delderfield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Delderfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Delderfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Delderfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Delderfield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Delderfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Delderfield. The network helps show where Mark Delderfield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Mark Delderfield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Delderfield Line = papers co-authored together Mark Delderfield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 2011201
2 201052
3 201530
4
Assessing the burden of asthma and COPD in Salford UK: Retrospective analysis using a whole population electronic medical record
20113
5 20090
6 20080

About Mark Delderfield

Mark Delderfield is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Information Systems, Information Systems and Management and Epidemiology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 286 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (2 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (2 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (2 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (2 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (2 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (2 papers), Research Data Management Practices (2 papers) and Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (174 citations), Information Systems (168 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (50 citations), Health Information Management (14 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (90 citations). Mark Delderfield has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Shoaib Sufi, Stuart Owen, Matthew Gamble, Ian Dunlop, Iain Buchan, Sean Bechhofer, David De Roure, Jiten Bhagat, Danius Michaelides and Paolo Missier. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Future Generation Computer Systems, Studies in health technology and informatics and Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact