Philip Couch

929 citations
17 papers · 325 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Couch

17 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers

Philip Couch
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Information Systems and Management 181
  • Information Systems 172
  • Management Science and Operations Research 54
  • Computer Networks and Communications 66
  • Artificial Intelligence 88
Replace Mark Delderfield with:
Mark Delderfield United Kingdom
Matthew Gamble United Kingdom
Vivek Navale United States
Stephanie van de Sandt Switzerland
Frank Scholze Germany
Tomasz Miksa Austria
Maxi Kindling Germany
David Y. Hancock United States
Heinz Pampel Germany
Jonathan Crabtree United States
Philip Couch relative to Mark Delderfield United Kingdom Mark Delderfield's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Mark Delderfield · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Couch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Couch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Couch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Couch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Couch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Couch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Couch. The network helps show where Philip Couch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Couch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Couch Line = papers co-authored together Philip Couch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2011201
2 201052
3 198116
4 202311
5 201111
6 20227
7
Automatic metadata capture and grid computing
20067
8 20105
9 20114
10 20232
11 20062
12 20132
13 20201
14 20111
15 20151
16 20151
17 20171

About Philip Couch

Philip Couch is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems and Management, Management Science and Operations Research, Information Systems and General Health Professions, having authored 17 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scientific Computing and Data Management (5 papers), demographic modeling and climate adaptation (3 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (3 papers), Research Data Management Practices (3 papers), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (2 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (2 papers), Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research (2 papers) and Machine Learning in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (181 citations), Information Systems (172 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (54 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (66 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (88 citations). Philip Couch has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include John Ainsworth, Iain Buchan, David De Roure, Carole Goble, Shoaib Sufi, Mark Delderfield, Stuart Owen, Paolo Missier, David Newman and Matthew Gamble. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Heredity, Clinical and Translational Allergy, Methods of Information in Medicine and EClinicalMedicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact