Mark Dearden
Impact in
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
- Emergency Medicine top 0.5%
- Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Papers in
- Neurology 10
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances 10
- Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications 4
-
- Traumatic Brain Injury Research 5
- Co-authors
- Nino Stocchetti (10 shared papers)Franco Servadei (10 shared papers)Andrew I.R. Maas (9 shared papers)Juha Öhman (9 shared papers)Gordon Murray (9 shared papers)Fausto Iannotti (9 shared papers)Lennart Persson (7 shared papers)A. Karimi (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Neurosurgery (4 papers)Acta Neurochirurgica (3 papers)British Journal of Anaesthesia (1 paper)Current Opinion in Critical Care (1 paper)Journal of Insect Physiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Mark Dearden
13 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Neurology 1.3k
- Emergency Medicine 681
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 95
- Epidemiology 572
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 171
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Dearden
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Dearden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Dearden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Dearden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Dearden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Dearden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Dearden. The network helps show where Mark Dearden may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Mark Dearden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 424 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 289 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 135 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 128 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 116 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 98 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 88 | |
| 8 | 1993 | 65 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 42 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 18 | |
| 11 | 1964 | 11 | |
| 12 | 1988 | 3 | |
| 13 | The European brain injury consortium. Neuro solus satis rapid | 1998 | 1 |
About Mark Dearden
Mark Dearden is a scholar working on Neurology, Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine, Surgery and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 13 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (10 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (5 papers), Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications (4 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (3 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (1 paper), Nausea and vomiting management (1 paper) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (1.3k citations), Emergency Medicine (681 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (95 citations), Epidemiology (572 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (171 citations). Mark Dearden has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Nino Stocchetti, Franco Servadei, Andrew I.R. Maas, Juha Öhman, Gordon Murray, Fausto Iannotti, Lennart Persson, A. Karimi, F Cohadon and R. Braakman. Their work appears in journals such as Neurosurgery, Acta Neurochirurgica, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Current Opinion in Critical Care and Journal of Insect Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.