Mark Cole

30 papers receiving 224 citations

Peers

Mark Cole
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • General Dentistry 24
  • Infectious Diseases 104
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 11
  • Leadership and Management 6
  • Research and Theory 4
Replace Ruth Everett‐Thomas with:
Ruth Everett‐Thomas United States
Randall Smith United States
Manal Bouhaimed Kuwait
JaHyun Kang South Korea
Stéphane Bouchoucha Australia
Mevlüde Karadağ Türkiye
Marília Duarte Valim Brazil
Elisa Fabbro Italy
Nancye Feistritzer United States
O G Uti Nigeria
Mark Cole relative to Ruth Everett‐Thomas United States Ruth Everett‐Thomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Ruth Everett‐Thomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Cole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Cole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Cole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Cole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Cole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Cole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Cole. The network helps show where Mark Cole may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Mark Cole, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Cole Line = papers co-authored together Mark Cole links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200858
2 200621
3 200021
4 201618
5
An initiative to improve the professional communication skills of first-year pharmacy students
200916
6 202016
7 200715
8 201113
9 200612
10
Stress in medical students.
19979
11 20088
12 20097
13 20096
14 20136
15 20196
16 20105
17 20124
18 20104
19 20194
20 20223

About Mark Cole

Mark Cole is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Clinical Psychology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 266 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infection Control in Healthcare (16 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (6 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (5 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (3 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (3 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (3 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Dentistry (24 citations), Infectious Diseases (104 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (11 citations), Leadership and Management (6 citations) and Research and Theory (4 citations). Mark Cole has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dan L. Bader, Dorit Kunkel, Ann Ashburn, Ruth Pickering, Catherine Bowen, Malcolm Burnett, Seán Dineen, Maggie Donovan‐Hall, Lynne Emmerton and Fiona Gaughran. Their work appears in journals such as Disability and Rehabilitation, Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, Nurse Education in Practice, Nurse Education Today and British Journal of Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact