Mark Chopping

2.7k citations
52 papers · 2.1k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Chopping

48 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Mark Chopping
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Environmental Engineering 945
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.1k
  • Ecology 1.3k
  • Ecological Modeling 176
  • Atmospheric Science 491
Replace Peter Scarth with:
Peter Scarth Australia
Saurabh Channan United States
David A.J. Ripley United States
V. Kovalskyy United States
Stephen M. Howard United States
Aleixandre Verger Spain
Nandin‐Erdene Tsendbazar Netherlands
C. Milesi United States
Todd A. Schroeder United States
D. Muchoney United States
Mark Chopping relative to Peter Scarth Australia Peter Scarth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Peter Scarth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Chopping

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Chopping's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Chopping with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Chopping more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Chopping

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Chopping. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Chopping. The network helps show where Mark Chopping may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Chopping, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Chopping Line = papers co-authored together Mark Chopping links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996311
2 2003306
3 2013214
4 2011134
5 2005130
6 2008116
7 201984
8 200080
9 200768
10 200659
11 201147
12 200645
13 201145
14 200342
15 202142
16 200537
17 201237
18 200935
19 200026
20 200225

About Mark Chopping

Mark Chopping is a scholar working on Ecology, Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science and Ecological Modeling, having authored 52 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Remote Sensing in Agriculture (31 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (19 papers), Urban Heat Island Mitigation (10 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (9 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (7 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (7 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (6 papers) and Calibration and Measurement Techniques (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Engineering (945 citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.1k citations), Ecology (1.3k citations), Ecological Modeling (176 citations) and Atmospheric Science (491 citations). Mark Chopping has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Roy Haines‐Young, A. Rango, John V. Martonchik, M. D. Steven, Frédéric Baret, Tim Malthus, Hui Xu, Crystal Schaaf, Lihong Su and Zhuosen Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Remote Sensing of Environment, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Global Biogeochemical Cycles and Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact