Mark Brooks
Impact in
- Animal Science and Zoology top 5%
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
Papers in
-
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 8
- RNA Research and Splicing 4
- Genetics 9
- Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology 7
- Co-authors
- Herman van Tilbeurgh (8 shared papers)J.L. Grimes (3 shared papers)K.E. Lloyd (3 shared papers)J. W. Spears (3 shared papers)Sophie Quevillon‐Chéruel (4 shared papers)D. K. Lunt (2 shared papers)Chang Weon Choi (2 shared papers)Stephen B. Smith (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Animal Science (3 papers)The Journal of Applied Poultry Research (2 papers)Microbial Drug Resistance (1 paper)Poultry Science (1 paper)Journal of Bacteriology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Mark Brooks
22 papers receiving 442 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Animal Science and Zoology 90
- Endocrinology 21
- Agronomy and Crop Science 42
- Genetics 108
- Molecular Medicine 19
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Brooks
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Brooks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Brooks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Brooks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Brooks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Brooks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Brooks. The network helps show where Mark Brooks may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Brooks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 56 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 37 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 26 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 17 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 17 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 17 | 1987 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 9 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 5 |
About Mark Brooks
Mark Brooks is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Animal Science and Zoology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Ecology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 453 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (8 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (7 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (4 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (3 papers), Trace Elements in Health (3 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (3 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (3 papers) and Turfgrass Adaptation and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (90 citations), Endocrinology (21 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (42 citations), Genetics (108 citations) and Molecular Medicine (19 citations). Mark Brooks has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Herman van Tilbeurgh, J.L. Grimes, K.E. Lloyd, J. W. Spears, Sophie Quevillon‐Chéruel, D. K. Lunt, Chang Weon Choi, Stephen B. Smith, M. S. Kerley and Bertrand Séraphin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, Microbial Drug Resistance, Poultry Science and Journal of Bacteriology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.