Catherine O’Neill
Impact in
- Dermatology top 1%
- Dermatology and Skin Diseases
- Neurology top 5%
- Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Papers in
-
- Connexins and lens biology 9
- Gut microbiota and health 7
- Dermatology 14
- Dermatology and Skin Diseases 12
- Co-authors
- John McLaughlin (7 shared papers)Andrew J. McBain (18 shared papers)Ralf Paus (3 shared papers)Giovanni Monteleone (1 shared paper)Philip J. Padfield (5 shared papers)D Lambert (5 shared papers)J P H Burt (2 shared papers)Sheena Cruickshank (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Experimental Dermatology (4 papers)Frontiers in Microbiology (4 papers)Scientific Reports (4 papers)Applied and Environmental Microbiology (3 papers)British Journal of Dermatology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Catherine O’Neill
76 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 175
- Dermatology 423
- Neurology 214
- Microbiology 124
- Rehabilitation 119
- Food Science 315
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine O’Neill
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine O’Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine O’Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine O’Neill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine O’Neill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine O’Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine O’Neill. The network helps show where Catherine O’Neill may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Catherine O’Neill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 316 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 154 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 136 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 124 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 122 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 121 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 94 | |
| 8 | 1993 | 90 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 88 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 87 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 64 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 63 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 61 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 59 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 53 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 43 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 41 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 40 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 40 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 40 |
About Catherine O’Neill
Catherine O’Neill is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Dermatology, Sociology and Political Science, Neurology and Food Science, having authored 82 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dermatology and Skin Diseases (12 papers), Barrier Structure and Function Studies (11 papers), Environmental Justice and Health Disparities (10 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (10 papers), Connexins and lens biology (9 papers), Environmental law and policy (7 papers), Gut microbiota and health (7 papers) and Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (423 citations), Neurology (214 citations), Microbiology (124 citations), Rehabilitation (119 citations) and Food Science (315 citations). Catherine O’Neill has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include John McLaughlin, Andrew J. McBain, Ralf Paus, Giovanni Monteleone, Philip J. Padfield, D Lambert, J P H Burt, Sheena Cruickshank, Barbara Harper and Tessa Prince. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Dermatology, Frontiers in Microbiology, Scientific Reports, Applied and Environmental Microbiology and British Journal of Dermatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.