Mark Bowen

668 citations
35 papers · 473 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Bowen

33 papers receiving 447 citations

Peers

Mark Bowen
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Computational Mechanics 215
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 96
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 45
  • Numerical Analysis 28
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 28
Replace Andrea Bonito with:
Andrea Bonito Italy
Daisuke Takagi United States
James M. Oliver United Kingdom
Daniel Floryan United States
O. Séro-Guillaume France
Glenn Ledder United States
M. A. F. Gomes Brazil
E. W. Hendricks United States
Tyler Van Buren United States
Richard E. Hewitt United Kingdom
Mark Bowen relative to Andrea Bonito Italy Andrea Bonito's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.5×
Andrea Bonito · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Bowen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Bowen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Bowen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Bowen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Bowen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Bowen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Bowen. The network helps show where Mark Bowen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Bowen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Bowen Line = papers co-authored together Mark Bowen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003111
2 202146
3 200139
4 200226
5 201520
6 202019
7 200519
8 200617
9 200615
10 200914
11 200813
12 200112
13 200112
14 201411
15 20229
16 20128
17 20138
18 20028
19 19788
20 20018

About Mark Bowen

Mark Bowen is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Materials Chemistry, Computer Networks and Communications and Ecology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films (13 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (8 papers), Solidification and crystal growth phenomena (6 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (5 papers), Marine and fisheries research (4 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (3 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (2 papers) and Energetic Materials and Combustion (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (215 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (96 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (45 citations), Numerical Analysis (28 citations) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (28 citations). Mark Bowen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Thomas P. Witelski, John R. King, James W. Haefner, B. S. Tilley, Andrea L. Bertozzi, Luiz G. M. Silva, Robert Behringer, Zachary L. Steel, Rachel L. Malison and Brendan P. Murphy. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Applied Mathematics, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, Physics of Fluids, Ecological Modelling and Neotropical Ichthyology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact