Mark Bowen

650 citations
30 papers · 427 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Bowen

29 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers

Mark Bowen
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Computational Mechanics 202
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 93
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 43
  • Numerical Analysis 24
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 25
Replace Daisuke Takagi with:
Daisuke Takagi United States
Daniel Floryan United States
Aila Särkkä Sweden
M. A. F. Gomes Brazil
Marc H. Williams United States
Quan Wang China
O. Séro-Guillaume France
Steffen Bohn France
Aaron A. Nelson United States
Richard E. Hewitt United Kingdom
Mark Bowen relative to Daisuke Takagi United States Daisuke Takagi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Daisuke Takagi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Bowen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Bowen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Bowen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Bowen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Bowen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Bowen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Bowen. The network helps show where Mark Bowen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Bowen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Bowen Line = papers co-authored together Mark Bowen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003105
2 202140
3 200137
4 200225
5 202019
6 200519
7 201517
8 200617
9 200615
10 200914
11 200813
12 200112
13 201411
14 200111
15 20019
16 20228
17 20138
18 20127
19 20057
20
Empirical and experimental analyses of secondary louver efficiency at the Tracy Fish Collection Facility: March 1996 to November 2007
20047

About Mark Bowen

Mark Bowen is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Materials Chemistry, Ecology and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 30 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films (12 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (8 papers), Solidification and crystal growth phenomena (6 papers), Marine and fisheries research (4 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (4 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (2 papers), Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (2 papers) and Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (202 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (93 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (43 citations), Numerical Analysis (24 citations) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (25 citations). Mark Bowen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Thomas P. Witelski, John R. King, James W. Haefner, B. S. Tilley, Luiz G. M. Silva, Andrea L. Bertozzi, Robert Behringer, J. Hulshof, Rebecca Flitcroft and Rahel Sollmann. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Applied Mathematics, Physics of Fluids, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, Ecological Modelling and Veterinary Record.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact