Mark Boons

429 citations
11 papers · 294 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Boons

10 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers

Mark Boons
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Computer Science Applications 95
  • Communication 60
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 86
  • Marketing 56
  • Health Informatics 7
Replace Juan D. Machin‐Mastromatteo with:
Juan D. Machin‐Mastromatteo Mexico
Patrick Pollok Germany
Alamir N. Al-Alawi Egypt
Mabel K. Minishi-Majanja South Africa
Andri Dayarana K. Silalahi Taiwan
Boyka Simeonova United Kingdom
Ivana Mijatović Serbia
Carole Brooke United Kingdom
Sung Joo Bae South Korea
Ard Huizing Netherlands
Mark Boons relative to Juan D. Machin‐Mastromatteo Mexico Juan D. Machin‐Mastromatteo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.6×
Juan D. Machin‐Mastromatteo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Boons

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Boons's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Boons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Boons more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Boons

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Boons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Boons. The network helps show where Mark Boons may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Mark Boons, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Boons Line = papers co-authored together Mark Boons links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2021114
2 2015110
3 201938
4 201811
5 20188
6
Working Together Alone in the Online Crowd: The effects of social motivations and individual knowledge backgrounds on the participation and performance of members of online crowdsourcing platforms
20145
7 20223
8 20132
9 20202
10 20131
11 20250

About Mark Boons

Mark Boons is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management, Computer Science Applications, Communication and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 11 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Open Source Software Innovations (3 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (3 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (3 papers), AI and HR Technologies (2 papers), Employer Branding and e-HRM (2 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (1 paper) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (95 citations), Communication (60 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (86 citations), Marketing (56 citations) and Health Informatics (7 citations). Mark Boons has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Ireland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Daan Stam, Harry G. Barkema, Jeroen Meijerink, Janet H. Marler, Anne Keegan, Yla Tausczik, Amanda J. Porter, Philipp Tuertscher, Luca Berchicci and Anna B. Holm. Their work appears in journals such as Research Policy, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Journal of Management Studies, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management and Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact