Mark A. Hoeft

492 citations
17 papers · 247 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Mark A. Hoeft

16 papers receiving 236 citations

Peers

Mark A. Hoeft
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 132
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 37
  • Surgery 193
  • Pharmacology 51
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 35
Replace Paul S. Tumber with:
Paul S. Tumber Canada
Arunangshu Chakraborty India
Sherdil Nath Sweden
David Flamer Canada
S. A. Lang Canada
Jacques T. Ya Deau United States
Victor M. Zayas United States
Hemmo A. Bosscher United States
Robert Doty United States
David Hiller United States
Mark A. Hoeft relative to Paul S. Tumber Canada Paul S. Tumber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Paul S. Tumber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark A. Hoeft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark A. Hoeft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark A. Hoeft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark A. Hoeft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark A. Hoeft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark A. Hoeft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark A. Hoeft. The network helps show where Mark A. Hoeft may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Mark A. Hoeft, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark A. Hoeft Line = papers co-authored together Mark A. Hoeft links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 200665
2 200545
3 201826
4 201825
5 201518
6 200814
7 200814
8 200611
9 20068
10 20055
11 20195
12 20064
13 20063
14 20072
15 20081
16 20071
17 20160

About Mark A. Hoeft

Mark A. Hoeft is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pharmacology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 247 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (9 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (7 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (4 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (2 papers) and Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (132 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (37 citations), Surgery (193 citations), Pharmacology (51 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (35 citations). Mark A. Hoeft has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Uganda. Frequent co-authors include James P. Rathmell, Paul G. Firth, James E. Janik, J. K. Kiwanuka, Stephen Ttendo, Edward A. Bittner, Christopher M. Aasted, Ke Peng, David Borsook and Edward George. Their work appears in journals such as Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, Anaesthesia, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, The Lancet and A & A Case Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact