Mark A. Chen
Impact in
- Accounting top 1%
- Corporate Finance and Governance
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
-
- FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Papers in
- Accounting 11
- Corporate Finance and Governance 7
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 6
- Finance 4
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 4
- Co-authors
- Qinxi Wu (4 shared papers)Baozhong Yang (1 shared paper)Anup Agrawal (4 shared papers)Sahiba Chadha (1 shared paper)Harley E. Ryan (2 shared papers)Conrad S. Ciccotello (2 shared papers)Duane J. Seppi (1 shared paper)Cindy R. Alexander (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Review of Financial Studies (2 papers)Management Science (2 papers)The Review of Corporate Finance Studies (2 papers)Quarterly Journal of Finance (2 papers)Research Policy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Mark A. Chen
13 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Mark A. Chen's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Accounting 522
- Management Information Systems 320
- Finance 262
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 67
- Strategy and Management 98
Countries citing papers authored by Mark A. Chen
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark A. Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark A. Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark A. Chen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark A. Chen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark A. Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark A. Chen. The network helps show where Mark A. Chen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Mark A. Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | How Valuable Is FinTech Innovation? Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 510 |
| 2 | 2006 | 124 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 113 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 98 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 78 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 45 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 42 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2026 | 0 |
About Mark A. Chen
Mark A. Chen is a scholar working on Accounting, Finance, Management Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation and Information Systems, having authored 14 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (7 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (6 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (4 papers), FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance (2 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (1 paper), Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (1 paper) and Intellectual Property and Patents (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (522 citations), Management Information Systems (320 citations), Finance (262 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (67 citations) and Strategy and Management (98 citations). Mark A. Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Qinxi Wu, Baozhong Yang, Anup Agrawal, Sahiba Chadha, Harley E. Ryan, Conrad S. Ciccotello, Duane J. Seppi, Cindy R. Alexander, Chester S. Spatt and James Edwin Owers. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Financial Studies, Management Science, The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, Quarterly Journal of Finance and Research Policy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.