The Review of Corporate Finance Studies

5.5k citations
227 papers · · active since 2011

Impact in

  • Finance top 5%
    • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
    • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
    • Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
  • Accounting top 5%
    • Corporate Finance and Governance
    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance

Papers in

    • Corporate Finance and Governance 99
    • Private Equity and Venture Capital 15
    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 8
    • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency 55
    • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 22

The Review of Corporate Finance Studies

190 papers receiving 5.3k citations

Peers

The Review of Corporate Finance Studies
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Finance 2k
  • Accounting 2k
  • Strategy and Management 966
  • Economics and Econometrics 1.5k
  • Management Information Systems 379
Replace China Finance Review International with:
China Finance Review International China
Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies South Korea
Journal of Economics Finance and Administrative Science Colombia
Financial Markets Institutions and Instruments United States
Risk Management and Insurance Review United States
Annual Review of Financial Economics United States
China Journal of Accounting Research China
Financial markets and portfolio management Germany
Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting United States
Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics Australia
The Review of Corporate Finance Studies relative to China Finance Review International China China Finance Review International's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
China Finance Review International · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Review of Corporate Finance Studies more than expected).

Fields of papers published in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies.

About The Review of Corporate Finance Studies

The 227 papers published in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies in the last decades have received a total of 5.5k indexed citations . Papers published in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies usually cover Accounting (130 papers), Finance (95 papers), Economics and Econometrics (40 papers), General Decision Sciences (4 papers) and Management Information Systems (14 papers) specifically the topics of Corporate Finance and Governance (99 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (55 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (22 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (15 papers), COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts (12 papers), FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance (11 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (10 papers) and Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (8 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies are Stefano Ramelli, Alexander F. Wagner, Wei Jiang, Yrjo J Koskinen, Chendi Zhang, Rui A. Albuquerque, Shuai Yang, José María Liberti, Mitchell A. Petersen and Viral V. Acharya.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact