Marco D’Imperio

19 papers receiving 594 citations

Peers

Marco D’Imperio
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Analytical Chemistry 221
  • Biochemistry 85
  • Organic Chemistry 229
  • Food Science 137
  • Spectroscopy 58
Replace Lieselot Hemeryck with:
Lieselot Hemeryck Belgium
J. D. Edwards‐Webb United Kingdom
P. van de Bovenkamp Netherlands
Elisabeth Barofsky United States
Mona Zakaria United States
Kirsten Skogerson United States
Å. Eriksson Sweden
Sylvie Chevolleau France
H. R. Scherf Germany
Marco D’Imperio relative to Lieselot Hemeryck Belgium Lieselot Hemeryck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.7×
Lieselot Hemeryck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Marco D’Imperio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marco D’Imperio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marco D’Imperio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marco D’Imperio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marco D’Imperio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marco D’Imperio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marco D’Imperio. The network helps show where Marco D’Imperio may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Marco D’Imperio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Marco D’Imperio Line = papers co-authored together Marco D’Imperio links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 200781
2 200674
3 200967
4 200454
5 201138
6 201234
7 201034
8 200431
9 201430
10 198429
11 201128
12 201123
13 201219
14 201217
15 201016
16 201313
17 201110
18
A combination of pirenzepine and cimetidine: a new approach to treatment of duodenal ulcer in "non-responders".
198510
19
Caratterizzazione NMR e analisi statistica di oli di oliva DOP veneti
20057

About Marco D’Imperio

Marco D’Imperio is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Epidemiology and Food Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 615 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Edible Oils Quality and Analysis (8 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (6 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (2 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (2 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (221 citations), Biochemistry (85 citations), Organic Chemistry (229 citations), Food Science (137 citations) and Spectroscopy (58 citations). Marco D’Imperio has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Luisa Mannina, A. L. Segre, Giacomo Dugo, Donatella Capitani, Maria Benedetta Donati, Domenico Rotilio, Anna Della Corte, Lucia Giordano, Ramón Aparicio and Diego L. García‐González. Their work appears in journals such as Thrombosis Research, Food Chemistry, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Journal of Proteomics and Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact