Marcelo Moock

15 papers receiving 164 citations

Peers

Marcelo Moock
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 10
  • Parasitology 33
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 19
  • Research and Theory 3
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 17
Replace Nicolas Donat with:
Nicolas Donat France
Kristyn Beam United States
Mohammed Salim Al‐Damluji United States
Zachary Berrens United States
Kathryn Haigh United Kingdom
Carmen Rita Santoro Italy
Juan Hinojosa Spain
T Chokwe Kenya
Dennis Amundson United States
Krasnalhia Lívia S. Abreu Brazil
Marcelo Moock relative to Nicolas Donat France Nicolas Donat's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
Nicolas Donat · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Marcelo Moock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marcelo Moock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marcelo Moock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marcelo Moock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marcelo Moock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marcelo Moock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marcelo Moock. The network helps show where Marcelo Moock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Marcelo Moock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Marcelo Moock Line = papers co-authored together Marcelo Moock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 202047
2 200721
3 200719
4 200516
5 200714
6 200713
7 201013
8 201911
9 19956
10 20076
11 20071
12 20091
13 20001
14 19991
15
Nursing Activities Score: Comparação com o Índice APACHE II e a Mortalidade em Pacientes Admitidos em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva* Nursing Activities Score: Comparison among the Index APACHE II and the Mortality in Patients Admitted in Intensive Care Unit
20071
16 20071
17 20220

About Marcelo Moock

Marcelo Moock is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Infectious Diseases, General Health Professions, Emergency Medicine and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 172 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare (3 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (3 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (2 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (2 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers) and Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (10 citations), Parasitology (33 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (19 citations), Research and Theory (3 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (17 citations). Marcelo Moock has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Joseph M. Vinetz, Anne Spichler, Lilia de Souza Nogueira, John A. D. Leake, Carlos Roberto Ribeiro de Carvalho, Suelene Aires Franca, Marcelo B. P. Amato, Anderson José, Sílvia Regina Rios Vieira and José Mauro Vieira. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care, Cardiovascular Research, Critical Care Medicine, PLoS ONE and American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact