Maozi Chen

526 citations
17 papers · 391 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Maozi Chen

17 papers receiving 387 citations

Peers

Maozi Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 100
  • Pharmacology 106
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 102
  • Toxicology 15
  • Aging 6
Replace Annamaria Lubelska with:
Annamaria Lubelska Poland
Agnieszka Olejarz‐Maciej Poland
Daniel Spinks United Kingdom
Phuong D. Nguyen United States
Leslie J. Street South Africa
Tadeusz Karcz Poland
Lilia Weizel Germany
Chidochangu P. Mpamhanga United Kingdom
John Maclean United Kingdom
Iain T. Collie United Kingdom
Maozi Chen relative to Annamaria Lubelska Poland Annamaria Lubelska's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Annamaria Lubelska · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Maozi Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maozi Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maozi Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maozi Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maozi Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maozi Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maozi Chen. The network helps show where Maozi Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Maozi Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Maozi Chen Line = papers co-authored together Maozi Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2020174
2 201936
3 202026
4 201224
5 202023
6 201922
7 202019
8 201919
9 202014
10 202011
11 20228
12 20214
13 20253
14 20203
15 20203
16 20221
17 20061

About Maozi Chen

Maozi Chen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 17 papers that have together received 391 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (11 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (2 papers), Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (2 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (2 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers) and Pancreatic function and diabetes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (100 citations), Pharmacology (106 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (102 citations), Toxicology (15 citations) and Aging (6 citations). Maozi Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Zhiwei Feng, Xiang‐Qun Xie, Terence F. McGuire, Ying Xue, Heng Liu, Youwen Zhuang, Ting-Hai Xu, Karsten Melcher, Junmei Wang and H. Eric Xu. Their work appears in journals such as ACS Chemical Neuroscience, Briefings in Bioinformatics, ACS Omega, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling and PLoS Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact