Manuel Matas

525 citations
16 papers · 409 · h-index 10

Impact in

    • Schizophrenia research and treatment
    • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
    • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies

Papers in

Manuel Matas

16 papers receiving 380 citations

Peers

Manuel Matas
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 98
  • Clinical Psychology 138
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 61
  • Emergency Medical Services 27
  • Pharmacology 57
Replace James G. Williams with:
James G. Williams United States
Allan Lundy United States
M. McIntosh Andrew United Kingdom
Xingjia Cui United States
Nick O’Connor Australia
B. B. Sethi India
J R Davidson United States
Walter W. Winslow United States
Annie St‐Hilaire Canada
William D. Weitzel United States
Manuel Matas relative to James G. Williams United States James G. Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
James G. Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Manuel Matas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Manuel Matas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Manuel Matas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Manuel Matas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Manuel Matas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Manuel Matas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Manuel Matas. The network helps show where Manuel Matas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Manuel Matas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Manuel Matas Line = papers co-authored together Manuel Matas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 198472
2 199261
3 199160
4 198950
5 198629
6 198428
7 199428
8 198720
9 199117
10 198713
11 19887
12 19877
13 19907
14
Approach to attention deficit disorder in adults.
20065
15 19953
16 20152

About Manuel Matas

Manuel Matas is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Pharmacology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 409 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers), Gun Ownership and Violence Research (1 paper) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (98 citations), Clinical Psychology (138 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (61 citations), Emergency Medical Services (27 citations) and Pharmacology (57 citations). Manuel Matas has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Douglas Staley, Ranjan Roy, Michael R. Thomas, Colin A. Ross, Barry Campbell, Allan Peterkin, Nady el‐Guebaly, John C. Pecknold, Wendy J. Ungar and Richard P. Swinson. Their work appears in journals such as The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, General Hospital Psychiatry, Academic Psychiatry, Comprehensive Psychiatry and Schizophrenia Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact