Malcolm Parker

2.1k citations
108 papers · 1.4k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Malcolm Parker

96 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Malcolm Parker
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 734
  • Family Practice 33
  • Pharmacy 65
  • General Health Professions 335
  • Emergency Medical Services 44
Replace Janice Chesters with:
Janice Chesters Australia
Kathleen R. Stevens United States
Soodabeh Joolaee Iran
Sujin Shin South Korea
Jennifer Greenwood Australia
Neal Maskrey United Kingdom
A. van den Brink-Muinen Netherlands
Marjorie Weiss United Kingdom
Sebahat Gözüm Türkiye
Carmel M. Martin Australia
Malcolm Parker relative to Janice Chesters Australia Janice Chesters's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Janice Chesters · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm Parker. The network helps show where Malcolm Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm Parker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm Parker Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm Parker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 108 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200889
2 201382
3 201679
4 200455
5 200153
6 201752
7 201444
8 200640
9 200539
10 201138
11
Advance care planning and end of life decision making.
200435
12 201531
13 201631
14 200829
15 199528
16 201128
17 199828
18 201624
19 200223
20 200421

About Malcolm Parker

Malcolm Parker is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pharmacy and Clinical Psychology, having authored 108 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (36 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (33 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (24 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (18 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (13 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (11 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (11 papers) and Healthcare Quality and Management (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (734 citations), Family Practice (33 citations), Pharmacy (65 citations), General Health Professions (335 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (44 citations). Malcolm Parker has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Colleen Cartwright, Lindy Willmott, Ben White, Gail Williams, Sarah Winch, Jianzhen Zhang, Erin McMeniman, Eliana Close, Cindy Gallois and Nicholas Graves. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, Journal of Medical Ethics, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Bioethics and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact