M. V. Mathews

70 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

M. V. Mathews
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Signal Processing 912
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 757
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 507
  • Music 62
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 235
Replace Curtis Roads with:
Curtis Roads United States
Giovanni De Poli Italy
Shlomo Dubnov United States
Jonathan Foote United States
Xavier Rodet France
Maarten van Walstijn United Kingdom
Bob L. Sturm Denmark
Patrick Cook United States
Chris Chafe United States
György Fazekas United Kingdom
M. V. Mathews relative to Curtis Roads United States Curtis Roads's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Curtis Roads · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. V. Mathews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. V. Mathews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. V. Mathews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. V. Mathews more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. V. Mathews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. V. Mathews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. V. Mathews. The network helps show where M. V. Mathews may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. V. Mathews, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. V. Mathews Line = papers co-authored together M. V. Mathews links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978217
2
The technology of computer music
1969184
3 199074
4 196973
5 197072
6 196368
7 196159
8 197047
9 197042
10 196441
11 196240
12 196337
13 199136
14
The conductor program and mechanical baton
198835
15 197334
16 197134
17 198833
18 196031
19 196029
20 196629

About M. V. Mathews

M. V. Mathews is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing, Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 80 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music Technology and Sound Studies (37 papers), Music and Audio Processing (20 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (14 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (13 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (11 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (10 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (8 papers) and Diverse Musicological Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (912 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (757 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (507 citations), Music (62 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (235 citations). M. V. Mathews has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John R. Pierce, Jean‐Claude Risset, Joan E. Miller, Bishnu S. Atal, John W. Tukey, Sandra Pruzansky, P. Denes, Edward E. David, Stephen Pope and Arthur Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Computer Music Journal, Physics Today, Science and Journal of the Audio Engineering Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact