M. Stoll

3.7k citations
117 papers · 1.5k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

    • Holomorphic and Operator Theory 28
    • Advanced Harmonic Analysis Research 14
    • Algebraic and Geometric Analysis 12
    • Meromorphic and Entire Functions 9

M. Stoll

109 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

M. Stoll
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Applied Mathematics 285
  • Geometry and Topology 116
  • Food Science 239
  • Horticulture 12
  • Organic Chemistry 334
Replace Yan Zhou with:
Yan Zhou China
D. Gröger Germany
Daniel Cabrol‐Bass France
Zhenfu Wang China
David T. Stanton United States
Catriona M. Spencer United Kingdom
Robert E. Childs United States
E. J. Eisenbraun United States
Teresa Cecchi Italy
Eun‐Hee Kim South Korea
M. Stoll relative to Yan Zhou China Yan Zhou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Yan Zhou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Stoll

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Stoll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Stoll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Stoll more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Stoll

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Stoll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Stoll. The network helps show where M. Stoll may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Stoll, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Stoll Line = papers co-authored together M. Stoll links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 117 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1967128
2 1970105
3 200358
4 197353
5 196752
6 196452
7 199449
8 196144
9 195942
10 201440
11 196238
12
Variations in lignin structure in defined morphological parts of spruce
198038
13 201634
14 196732
15 196432
16 195329
17 197726
18 199324
19 196724
20 200123

About M. Stoll

M. Stoll is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Geometry and Topology and Mathematical Physics, having authored 117 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Holomorphic and Operator Theory (28 papers), Advanced Harmonic Analysis Research (14 papers), Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (12 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (12 papers), Analytic and geometric function theory (10 papers), Meromorphic and Entire Functions (9 papers), Advanced Cellulose Research Studies (8 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (285 citations), Geometry and Topology (116 citations), Food Science (239 citations), Horticulture (12 citations) and Organic Chemistry (334 citations). M. Stoll has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include B. Willhalm, E. Demole, I. Flament, M. Winter, Dietrich Fengel, C. F. Seidel, F. Gautschi, Paul Enggist, Ervin sz. Kováts and Paul Dietrich. Their work appears in journals such as Helvetica Chimica Acta, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Wood Science and Technology, European Journal of Wood and Wood Products and Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact