M Staak

97 papers receiving 419 citations

Peers

M Staak
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Toxicology 57
  • Emergency Medicine 65
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 18
  • Ophthalmology 29
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 53
Replace Hideo Ishizu with:
Hideo Ishizu Japan
W Bonte Germany
S. Seidl Germany
Birgitte Kringsholm Denmark
Marcus Nashelsky United States
Kilak Kesha New Zealand
Brita Zilg Sweden
Richard W. Snyder United States
Audrey Farrugia France
James L. Caruso United States
M Staak relative to Hideo Ishizu Japan Hideo Ishizu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Hideo Ishizu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M Staak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M Staak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M Staak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M Staak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M Staak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M Staak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M Staak. The network helps show where M Staak may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M Staak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M Staak Line = papers co-authored together M Staak links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 117 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200530
2 200327
3 198824
4 199422
5 199419
6 199518
7 199118
8 199413
9 199812
10 199811
11 199711
12 199511
13
[Empirical studies of automobile driving fitness of patients treated with methadone-substitution].
199311
14
Experimental studies for testing claimed after-drinks. The problems in searching for congeners of ethanol from alcoholic beverages in body fluids
198210
15
Suicide in the psychiatric hospital. International trends and medico legal aspects.
19889
16 20038
17 19698
18 19948
19 19597
20 19837

About M Staak

M Staak is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Genetics, Emergency Medicine and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 117 papers that have together received 480 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (8 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (8 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (6 papers), Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (5 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers) and Medical and Health Sciences Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (57 citations), Emergency Medicine (65 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (18 citations), Ophthalmology (29 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (53 citations). M Staak has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Burkhard Madea, R Iffland, Mechthild Prinz, H Käferstein, Cornelia Schmitt, Yiping Hou, G Berghaus, H. Graß, G Sticht and Katalin Maderspach. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Legal Medicine, Forensic Science International, Transplant International, RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren and Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact