M. Scheel
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 1%
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Nuclear physics research studies
Papers in
-
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 24
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 2
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 1
-
- Neutrino Physics Research 1
M. Scheel
23 papers receiving 10.7k citations
M. Scheel's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 9.7k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.9k
- Instrumentation 79
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 189
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 149
Countries citing papers authored by M. Scheel
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Scheel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Scheel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Scheel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Scheel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Scheel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Scheel. The network helps show where M. Scheel may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 7690 |
| 2 | A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 957 |
| 3 | Tests of General Relativity with GW170817 Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 543 |
| 4 | Observation of Gravitational Waves from Two Neutron Star-Black Hole Coalescences Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 536 |
| 5 | Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion History from GWTC–3 Hit paper breakdown → | 2023 | 204 |
| 6 | 2021 | 160 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 131 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 106 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 96 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 75 | |
| 11 | Tests of general relativity with GWTC-3 Hit paper breakdown → | 2025 | 70 |
| 12 | 2013 | 66 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 63 | |
| 14 | GW250114: Testing Hawking’s Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes Hit paper breakdown → | 2025 | 58 |
| 15 | 2018 | 48 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 46 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 41 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 35 | |
| 19 | 2025 | 21 | |
| 20 | 2025 | 10 |
About M. Scheel
M. Scheel is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Nuclear Energy and Engineering, Waste Management and Disposal and Infectious Diseases, having authored 25 papers that have together received 11k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (24 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (2 papers), Neutrino Physics Research (1 paper) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (9.7k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.9k citations), Instrumentation (79 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (189 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (149 citations). M. Scheel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Italy. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. D, The Astrophysical Journal, The Astrophysical Journal Letters and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.