Erika Baum

3.8k citations
107 papers · 2.5k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Erika Baum

102 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Erika Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Pharmacology 484
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 236
  • Family Practice 27
  • Rehabilitation 87
  • Physiology 285
Replace Margo McCaffery with:
Margo McCaffery United States
Mitchell Haas United States
Margot W. M. de Waal Netherlands
Ian Watt United Kingdom
E.John Gallagher United States
Thomas Reinhold Germany
Barbara A. Rakel United States
Pinchas Halpern Israel
Michael Bond United Kingdom
Mei‐Ling Yeh Taiwan
Erika Baum relative to Margo McCaffery United States Margo McCaffery's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Margo McCaffery · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Erika Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erika Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erika Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erika Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erika Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erika Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erika Baum. The network helps show where Erika Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Erika Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Erika Baum Line = papers co-authored together Erika Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 107 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010240
2 2008153
3 2017142
4 2009103
5 197699
6 197693
7 201084
8 201974
9 200870
10 200864
11 200861
12 201653
13 201149
14 201147
15 201047
16 201447
17 199945
18 201744
19 200742
20 200740

About Erika Baum

Erika Baum is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Surgery, having authored 107 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (15 papers), Health and Medical Studies (13 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (7 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers) and Health, psychology, and well-being (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (484 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (236 citations), Family Practice (27 citations), Rehabilitation (87 citations) and Physiology (285 citations). Erika Baum has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Norbert Donner‐Banzhoff, Annette Becker, Stefan Keller, Corinna Leonhardt, Heinz-Dieter Basler, Andreas Sönnichsen, Jean‐François Chenot, Michael M. Kochen, M. Pfingsten and Stefan Bösner. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Family Practice, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Spine, Family Practice and British Journal of General Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact