M. Locke
Impact in
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Insect Science top 1%
- Insect Utilization and Effects
- Insect and Pesticide Research
Papers in
-
- Insect Resistance and Genetics 14
- Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications 3
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 24
- Co-authors
- Janet V. Collins (3 shared papers)Philip Huie (13 shared papers)N. Krishnan (4 shared papers)Helen Nichol (4 shared papers)James T. McMahon (2 shared papers)Burr G. Atkinson (2 shared papers)Earl G. Noble (2 shared papers)Stan L. Smith (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Tissue and Cell (18 papers)The Journal of Cell Biology (6 papers)Journal of Cell Science (5 papers)Nature (5 papers)Journal of Insect Physiology (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
M. Locke
57 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.0k
- Insect Science 707
- Genetics 764
- Rehabilitation 120
- Molecular Biology 1.3k
Countries citing papers authored by M. Locke
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Locke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Locke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Locke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Locke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Locke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Locke. The network helps show where M. Locke may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Locke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1965 | 258 | |
| 2 | 1968 | 241 | |
| 3 | 1990 | 142 | |
| 4 | 1959 | 124 | |
| 5 | 1969 | 123 | |
| 6 | 1970 | 110 | |
| 7 | 1980 | 104 | |
| 8 | 1971 | 102 | |
| 9 | 1971 | 98 | |
| 10 | 1971 | 98 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 98 | |
| 12 | 1971 | 92 | |
| 13 | 1975 | 90 | |
| 14 | 1977 | 68 | |
| 15 | 1979 | 66 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 62 | |
| 17 | 1966 | 58 | |
| 18 | 1958 | 57 | |
| 19 | 1990 | 55 | |
| 20 | 1960 | 54 |
About M. Locke
M. Locke is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, Insect Science and Cell Biology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (24 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (18 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (14 papers), Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (4 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (3 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (3 papers), Silk-based biomaterials and applications (3 papers) and Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Insect Science (707 citations), Genetics (764 citations), Rehabilitation (120 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.3k citations). M. Locke has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Janet V. Collins, Philip Huie, N. Krishnan, Helen Nichol, James T. McMahon, Burr G. Atkinson, Earl G. Noble, Stan L. Smith, Walter E. Bollenbacher and Robert M. Tanguay. Their work appears in journals such as Tissue and Cell, The Journal of Cell Biology, Journal of Cell Science, Nature and Journal of Insect Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.