M. J. Mitchell

50 papers receiving 983 citations

Peers

M. J. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Insect Science 222
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 222
  • Organic Chemistry 303
  • Pharmacology 75
  • Biochemistry 53
Replace Marvin Carmack with:
Marvin Carmack United States
Yasuhiro Itagaki Japan
Tetsuro Shinada Japan
T. Norin Sweden
Tetsuto Tsunoda Japan
T. Tokuyama Japan
Jonathan W. Paschal United States
David B. Millar United States
Chang‐An Yu United States
Clive A. Henrick United States
M. J. Mitchell relative to Marvin Carmack United States Marvin Carmack's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Marvin Carmack · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. J. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. J. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. J. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. J. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. J. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. J. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. J. Mitchell. The network helps show where M. J. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. J. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. J. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together M. J. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198792
2 195985
3 197183
4 199763
5 199359
6 198751
7 196048
8 198847
9 198246
10 198645
11 196637
12 198137
13 198635
14
ECDYSONE 20-MONOOXYGENASE SYSTEMS IN A LARVAL AND AN ADULT DIPTERAN: AN OVERVIEW OF THEIR BIOCHEMISTRY, PHYSIOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
198634
15 196832
16 198830
17 196827
18 198823
19 200319
20 199218

About M. J. Mitchell

M. J. Mitchell is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Insect Science, Organic Chemistry, Pharmacology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Pesticide Research (8 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (8 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (5 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (4 papers), Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (4 papers) and Various Chemistry Research Topics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (222 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (222 citations), Organic Chemistry (303 citations), Pharmacology (75 citations) and Biochemistry (53 citations). M. J. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Stan L. Smith, Michael P. Cava, Sami I. Harik, Raj N. Kalaria, Orval Mamer, E. David Morgan, Barbara E. Laughon, S. Lin, A. A. Deana and T. G. TRAYLOR. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Tetrahedron Letters, Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact