M. Frances Van Loo

452 citations
13 papers · 349 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

M. Frances Van Loo

13 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

M. Frances Van Loo
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Information Systems and Management 69
  • Applied Psychology 34
  • Gender Studies 69
  • Marketing 49
  • Demography 60
Replace Dafna Eylon with:
Dafna Eylon United States
Bonnie S. O’Neill United States
Lukas Neville Canada
Carol C. Cirka United States
Robert Knoop Canada
Bonnie L. McNeely United States
Donald L. Kanter United States
Beata Chorągwicka Spain
Gerald W. McDonald United States
David Tang United States
M. Frances Van Loo relative to Dafna Eylon United States Dafna Eylon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Dafna Eylon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Frances Van Loo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Frances Van Loo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Frances Van Loo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Frances Van Loo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Frances Van Loo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Frances Van Loo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Frances Van Loo. The network helps show where M. Frances Van Loo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside M. Frances Van Loo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Frances Van Loo Line = papers co-authored together M. Frances Van Loo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2001154
2 199359
3 201439
4 197836
5 197818
6
Decision-making and fertility: a theory of exchange in the family.
197810
7 19859
8 19887
9 19845
10 19825
11 19913
12 19793
13 19871

About M. Frances Van Loo

M. Frances Van Loo is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Social Psychology and Information Systems and Management, having authored 13 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (8 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (6 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (5 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper), Cultural Differences and Values (1 paper), Gender Diversity and Inequality (1 paper) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (69 citations), Applied Psychology (34 citations), Gender Studies (69 citations), Marketing (49 citations) and Demography (60 citations). M. Frances Van Loo has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Richard P. Bagozzi, Karlene H. Roberts and Warren Boeker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Psychology, Journal of Consumer Research, Human Relations, Psychology and Health and California Management Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact